Posts tagged Search
PubCon 2011 Wrap Up
From November 7-11, the SEOwebhosting.net team took part in PubCon, the premier search and social media conference and expo in the lovely city of Las Vegas. With over 200 speakers and a vast sea of exhibitors, there was a lot to cover, but the SEOWH team found time to play the role of “Welcome Wagon” for weary conference-goers by supplying free limo rides to the Luxor and MGM Grand hotels from the airport.

Judging from the outpouring of Twitter love and the 100+ smiling, bleary-eyed people that were jettisoned to and fro over a period of 16 hours, the gesture was well received.

There were two particular sessions I attended that stood out. The first was “Essentials Overlooked by 90% of Affiliate Managers”, which provided a look into trends and strategies within the affiliate space. Panelist Keith Posehn (@kzorz) made a few great points:
- Contact startups with relevant web 2.0 apps to be an affiliate
(like hipmunk.com)- Read blogs like techcrunch to find those companies
- Be a good gate keeper and don’t let just anyone sign-up for your program
- Get a demo or explanation to make sure the startup is real

I also attended “The Convergence of Social Media and Search” which discussed the blending of social media into search results. Rebecca Murtagh (@virtualmarketer) had some terrific tips on what to pay attention to as these worlds blend together, and David Wallace (@davidwallace) provided some insight on infographics.
Here’s a brief rundown of points from each.
Your brand can dominate the SERPs with a YouTube channel, social media profiles.
Google+ and Linkedin profiles/pages are essential for business.
Optimize your social media profiles to push traffic to the main website.
Survey your clients to see when and where they use social media.
Focus on quality of audience and conversions, not on the size of your following.
Infographics should be…
Time sensitive
Historical
Resourceful
Entertaining
Chock-full of facts, trends, and ideas
List your citations
Publishing on your domain to get links but also provide embed code and other tools for easy sharing.
Bottom line? We had a great time, and got to meet a lot of fantastic folks.
Although the SEOWH team soaked up a hefty sum of knowledge, we couldn’t be all places at all times. Click here for the official (and incredibly thorough) list of PubCon wrap-ups for coverage of most of the PubCon seminars. See you at PubCon 2012 in Hawaii!
10 New Google Algorithm Changes You Should Know
You can’t beat the Official Google blog when you’re looking for up-to-the-nanosecond updates in their algorithm. 
Although they make hundreds upon hundreds of evaluation, ranking and algorithmic changes per year, they’ve been especially active in the last couple weeks, and recently reported on ten of the more exciting updates they’ve implemented. Here’s a rundown for you (compliments of the Google Blog).
Also, here’s an informative video that looks into the methodology behind Google’s search ranking, evaluation and algorithm changes. Great stuff!
- Cross-language information retrieval updates: For queries in languages where limited web content is available (Afrikaans, Malay, Slovak, Swahili, Hindi, Norwegian, Serbian, Catalan, Maltese, Macedonian, Albanian, Slovenian, Welsh, Icelandic), we will now translate relevant English web pages and display the translated titles directly below the English titles in the search results. This feature was available previously in Korean, but only at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the translated titles will take you to pages translated from English into the query language.
- Snippets with more page content and less header/menu content: This change helps us choose more relevant text to use in snippets. As we improve our understanding of web page structure, we are now more likely to pick text from the actual page content, and less likely to use text that is part of a header or menu.
- Better page titles in search results by de-duplicating boilerplate anchors: We look at a number of signals when generating a page’s title. One signal is the anchor text in links pointing to the page. We found that boilerplate links with duplicated anchor text are not as relevant, so we are putting less emphasis on these. The result is more relevant titles that are specific to the page’s content.
- Length-based autocomplete predictions in Russian: This improvement reduces the number of long, sometimes arbitrary query predictions in Russian. We will not make predictions that are very long in comparison either to the partial query or to the other predictions for that partial query. This is already our practice in English.
- Extending application rich snippets: We recently announced rich snippets for applications. This enables people who are searching for software applications to see details, like cost and user reviews, within their search results. This change extends the coverage of application rich snippets, so they will be available more often.
- Retiring a signal in Image search: As the web evolves, we often revisit signals that we launched in the past that no longer appear to have a significant impact. In this case, we decided to retire a signal in Image Search related to images that had references from multiple documents on the web.
- Fresher, more recent results: As we announced just over a week ago, we’ve made a significant improvement to how we rank fresh content. This change impacts roughly 35 percent of total searches (around 6-10% of search results to a noticeable degree) and better determines the appropriate level of freshness for a given query.
- Refining official page detection: We try hard to give our users the most relevant and authoritative results. With this change, we adjusted how we attempt to determine which pages are official. This will tend to rank official websites even higher in our ranking.
- Improvements to date-restricted queries: We changed how we handle result freshness for queries where a user has chosen a specific date range. This helps ensure that users get the results that are most relevant for the date range that they specify.
- Prediction fix for IME queries: This change improves how Autocomplete handles IME queries (queries which contain non-Latin characters). Autocomplete was previously storing the intermediate keystrokes needed to type each character, which would sometimes result in gibberish predictions for Hebrew, Russian and Arabic.
Local Search Gets Rich Snippets from Google
Chris Crum over at WebProNews just posted about how Google has decided to use Rich Snippets for Local Search. Now, SEOs can use this data to help reference real world places and events and better optimize for local results and multiple web hosting locations.
Carter Maslan, Google’s Product Director for Local Search or something equally fancy and technical sounding spoke on the changes, “”By using structured HTML formats like hCard to markup the business or organization described on your page, you make it easier for search engines like Google to properly classify your site, recognize and understand that its content is about a particular place, and make it discoverable to users on Place pages.”
Google wants webmasters to use structured markup systems to help the search engine determine the location of your site but to use their provided forms to give them a glimpse of what you’re trying to provide with your content.
Google says it’s excited to expand local even further and wants small business owners everywhere to have more control over what their local listing looks like. Markup does not guarantee your site a listing in local, but any insight you give Google will help them determine the best way to display your results.
There’s a Frequently Asked Questions page provided by Google for customers interesting in utilizing the new rich snippets function for Local Search.
Article summary provided by Heather Hendrick
Replacing Data Lost in the Yahoo!/Bing Merger
Rand Fishkin addresses the loss to SEO data that came from the big Yahoo! and Bing search results merge last year. Yahoo! provided mounds of useful data, and the industry now faces the challenge of replacing it with something else.
Yahoo currently still retains its SiteExplorer service, but advanced commands or modified query searches no longer return results leaving webmasters unable to use advanced parameters and the data that came with them. There are lots of good replacement services, though, and we’re here to describe them.
- LinkScape Advanced Reports
Now users are able to apply filters through the UI on Linkscape and get many of the same results they could previously get from Yahoo.
- Open Site Explorer CSVs and Exporting Tools
Open Site Explorer aims for speed, so unlike LinkScape you can’t mess with filters right in the interface, rather you must import your data ready to go through an API. Conversely, when you export the data out of Open Site Explorer into an Excel or CSV, you can easily filter from there.
- Majestic SEO
Based in the UK, Majestic offers a function for backlink research through its MJ-12 tool. With the same filtering available as from LinkScape, the data here may not be as fresh as it’s tapped from different indexes, but a lot of people in the SEO hosting industry really like this tool.
- Yahoo! Site Explorer Exporter
Just like with the Open Site Explorer tool, Yahoo! offers its own export function. The major limitation is the 1000 link limit, but SEOs can get around this by requesting a search of sites with multiple pages on the same link.
- SEOmoz API
This is a really powerful tool at a reasonable price and it offers link data for up to 1 million calls per month. Open Site Exlporer, Conductor, and Hubspot are all run off this basic functionality.
- Yahoo! In Other Regions (for now)
Yahoo India and Yahoo Italy still currently serve the same search results that Yahoo US used to serve, so happy searching while the good data lasts! This won’t be around forever though as Yahoo plans a full roll out over the next 2 years.
- Other Options
Google Webmaster Tools, Bing Webmaster Tools, Exalead, Blekko, and Alexa all offer some means of tracking data previously held by Yahoo. Good luck finding what you need and let us know if you come up with other solutions!
Mobile Carriers and Search Engines: A Dangerous Relationship
Suzzicks over at SEOmoz recently had some interesting insights into the crazy search results shown through mobile carriers. We’ve broken down the highlights for you here, below:
Universal Results are by far the most mobile friendly as they allow users to be totally interactive. For example, you can click on a phone number to call, a map to get directions or even listen to a simultaneously buy a song.
Though Universal results are interesting, they’re often fraught with trouble considering you never know what kind of result you’re going to get, depending on the phone you’re using. Along with Google’s algorithm changes, results vary week to week. For example, using an iPhone to look up “Britney Spears” a year ago produced vastly different results this year as the mobile carrier displayed results based on availability of adjoining apps.
The recent Verizon/Google net neutrality news has deepened the issue of mobile carrier/search relationships since SERP results could be affected by a potential deal, and neutrality may be threatened. As it stands now, carriers offer users three search options which is still at a level less than impartial.
Universal Triggers vary from phone to phone, and many of the carriers currently have deals with the phone companies to provide search engine services if their engine is the default search method on the phone. Many customers assume that when they search on Google.com on their phones they’re getting the same results they’d get searching Google.com on a PC, but this is incorrect as Google chooses search results based on the carrier, the type of phone, and the websites’ structure. As an example, T-Mobile sets a cookie so that users who search for mobile results one time will get the Universal Results displayed to them every time thereafter or until they clear their cookies.
Most people don’t take the time or even know how to change the Start default page on their mobile phones, or even their home computers for that matter. Universal Listing results are therefore having an effect on mobile SEO that SEOs and seo hosting companies have never had to deal with before, pushing traditional listings down and affecting rankings altogether.
This formatting makes it nearly impossible to determine rankings in a general sense and make an SEO’s job very difficult. As search engines and phone carriers are quiet about their connections it becomes even harder to determine who’s working with who, and exactly what kinds of deals are affecting “organic” search results.
Thanks to Heather Hendrick for the summary
Win Your Brand’s SERP Results Page
Danny Dover posted an interesting whiteboard over at SEOmoz where he gave suggestions for helping businesses dominate the SERP results for their brand. We’ve summarized it for you here on our seo hosting blog as it’s potentially very useful for seo web hosting companies.
First, build your .com –
It’s important to make your hub look good, but not for the obvious reasons. Instead, link to other sources and sites that are talking about your brand using keywords like “MY BRAND on Twitter” to send link juice for those particular anchor text toward your site.
Build a second brand site –
Don’t use a subdomain to do this, but rather a single page on a totally separate domain to give it more equity. Only complete this step after you’ve totally shored up your core property. This will help you garner a second spot in the rankings for similar terms and brands to you own and drive visitors to the pages you want.
Create some social media profiles –
For obvious reasons, you’ll want to create some social media profiles to help get your brand name out there. Focus on the big guns: Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.. These profiles can help round out your SERP results and make your brand more recognizable to the engines.
Get out there with PR –
Doing interviews or news articles about your brand is a great way to garner links. Post these articles or news snippets on your hub page and begin to develop links to this content which will further round out your SERP results. These types of links are generally pretty powerful.
Pay per click –
Less obvious than some of the other suggestions, this tactic encourages you to bid for your brand term using paid search. This way, you can control the ads on your SERP page and really drive traffic to the links you want rather than hope your customers visit your hub site.
Heather Hendrick’s summary
Microsoft Search Results now being shown by Yahoo
Back in 2010, WebProNews started reporting on the Yahoo and Microsoft merger and how that affected search results. At that time, up to 25% of results shown on Yahoo were coming from Microsoft and up to 3.5% of paid ads were coming from Microsoft’s ad network.
Yahoo’s VP of search stated, “The primary change for these tests is that the listings are coming from Microsoft, however, the overall page should look the same as the Yahoo! Search you’re used to – with rich content and unique tools and features from Yahoo!. If you happen to fall into our tests, you might also notice some differences in how we’re displaying select search results due to a variety of product configurations we are testing.”
For SEO, Microsoft’s team provides the following helpful hints:
- Keep comparing rankings in Yahoo and Bing to find out which keywords make the most sense for you to pursue
- Modify your paid search campaigns based on what you forsee changing in the organic sphere
- Get invested in Bing webmaster tools as Microsoft software will be responsible for reporting going forward
It was also a good time to check and see that crawl policies concerning Yahoobots as well as Bingbots were congruent, and users should have noticed a spike in Bing bot visits after the merge.
Bing Webmaster Tools had been completely redesigned for the merge and had a bunch of new features and tools that many SEOs might find useful. As summarized by a Bing spokesman:
“The redesigned Bing Webmaster Tools provide you a simplified, more intuitive experience focused on three key areas: crawl, index and traffic. New features, such as Index Explorer and Submit URLs, provide a more comprehensive view as well as better control over how Bing crawls and indexes your sites. Index Explorer gives you unprecedented access to browse through the Bing index in order to verify which of your directories and pages have been included. Submit URLs gives you the ability to signal which URLs Bing should add to the index. Other new features include: Crawl Issues to view details on redirects, malware, and exclusions encountered while crawling sites; and Block URLs to prevent specific URLs from appearing in Bing search engine results pages. In addition, the new tools take advantage of Microsoft Silverlight 4 to deliver rich charting functionality that will help you quickly analyze up to six months of crawling, indexing, and traffic data. That means more transparency and more control to help you make decisions, which optimize your sites for Bing.”
The good news is, a lot of businesses actually see better results from Bing than they do from Google, so with the merge and increased Bing market share, many SEOs could see a bump in traffic. The announcement was followed with the news that by September of 2010, users should expect that one hundred percent of all Bing and Yahoo results will be powered by Microsoft. The time for Bing optimization is now.
Heather Hendrick, writer
Identifying Opportunities using Google’s Webmaster Tools Search Queries Report
Tom_C, head of keyword research over at SEOmoz recently posted about capturing the opportunities on your site that are low effort but high reward which we’ve summarized for you here.
There’s a great tool out there, the new search queries report in Google Webmaster Tools that makes this happen easier than ever.
The first step…
…is to gather the fruit. That means that you’ve got to do some research on your keyword terms in WMT and make sure to filter your results for the country you’re aiming for. The more filtered you are, the more accurate and helpful your results will be. After you’ve filtered, download the whole thing to Excel.
The second step…
…is to identify your fruit. This means you’ve got to do some replacements in Excel to get rid of dummy data, and once you do that, you should have a smaller list of keyterms that will be a breeze to scan through. SEOmoz had 97, for example.
Now look at the fruit. You should be able to identify your best opportunities based on your scores for things like rankings, impressions, clicks, etc. For example, SEOmoz has some low hanging fruit opportunities in words like “SEO” and “Social Media Marketing.” It’s important here to note that low hanging fruit doesn’t necessarily mean you’re looking at easy search terms. SEO is one of the hardest terms to get!
One other thing to note when looking at this data is that the data for items like impressions, ranking, and the like may not necessarily be the most reliable when coming from Google Webmaster tools. Hopefully you’ve got some better tools to gauge these metrics than Google…after all, the numbers reported in WebMaster Tools don’t always even match those reported in Analytics! Keep this in mind when you’re looking over your keywords and plan accordingly.
Heather Hendrick responsible for summarizing
How do you know what is search spam?
by Mike Moran
Last week, I asked the musical question, “Is Your SEO Strategy to Barely Avoid Spamming?” One of the commenters told me that he waited and waited in that article to find out what the line was between spamming and ethical behavior, but I didn’t tell him. So, that’s what we tackle this week.
Spam has an easy definition: it’s anything the search engines don’t allow. You can read the search engines’ terms of service (for example, Google calls them quality guidelines)
All the usual suspects are there, ranging from tricking the search engine by showing the search engines a different page from what the searchers see, all the way to creating fake links or buying links to fool the engines into thinking your page is better than it is.
You’ll hear all sorts of different names for these tricks: hidden text, link farms, paid links, cloaking—there are even more sophisticated techniques. Negative SEO is a way for your competitor to set up a link farm pointing to your site so that Google punishes you, thinking you did it. I know people setting up fake social media profiles so that they can fool Google into thinking many people are talking about their content.
You can check out all these ideas and more, to try to figure out where the lines are. As we discussed last week, you can decide that your strategy is to understand just what is allowed and what isn’t, so you can go right up to the line. (Or maybe just a tad over it.)
Image by Grumbler %-| via Flickr
I believe that is a mistake. Even if you think you know exactly where the line is, it is in the end a judgment call by each search engine. And it is dumb luck whether you are caught or not. And honestly, no one but the search engines really know where the lines are.
I think we can all do better. Next time, ask yourself if what you are doing is good for all three parties in the search transaction. Is this tactic good for you (the search marketer), good for searchers, and good for the search engine, too? If it is, keep it up. Whatever you are doing is not only not spam, but it is something good for everyone involved, so it will eventually be rewarded—perhaps immediately.
But any time you are doing something that does not work for everyone, it will eventually be branded spam or it will be made ineffective, or both.
A few years ago, all the smart SEOs were talking about “PageRank sculpting,” a technique that helped you control the level of quality that each page on your site has in the eyes of Google. All you needed to do was to carefully control which pages linked to which other pages on your site and voila!–you improve the search rankings of the pages you want. And it worked–for a while.
But who was that technique helping? It was helping the search marketer, but not really helping Google or the searcher, so eventually search engines stopped calculating their ranking algorithms the same way and the technique stopped working.
Today, many smart SEOs tell you that you must buy links to get the rankings you need. I know a few companies that do little else but sell links on content networks that are undetectable by search engines.You might or might not think that buying links is unethical, but it is clearly bad for the search engines, because the “wrong” pages (not the ones searchers might want) are ranked higher. So, the search engines are fighting back. Many SEOs ask me, “How will they stop it? No one can see the money change hands.” My answer is that I don’t know for sure how they will stop it. I am sure that the search engines use algorithms to sniff out the dicey links and give them less weight. But the search engines have a secret weapon.
They control their ranking algorithms. If it ever gets to the point that the search results are being too heavily affected by paid links, the search engines can stop valuing links completely (or as heavily). They can rank the pages based on page views, social media activity, or just about anything else that strikes their fancy. They can rank based on all these factors so that when all the factors don’t agree, the search engines downgrade—then you’ll have to fake links and fake social media activity and fake page views for it all to work (or even more stuff). The search engines haven’t done that (yet) because links still work well enough. But if enough people start buying links, then the search engines will find a way to regain the balance in the marketplace, because their very business depends on it.
So, the short answer is to stick to things that help everybody. Better content that contains the right keywords helps searchers understand things better. Be helpful or entertaining, because then you’ll attract links, activity, and every other visible indicator of attention—that marks your site as being of high quality. Everybody wins.
But if it feels clever and tricky and like something that you don’t want your competitors or customers to know you are doing, stop. If it isn’t against the search engines’ rules, it soon will be. If it is working now, it soon won’t be.
Likes Mean Relevance in Facebook Search
Nick O’Neill at All Facebook reports that Facebook has confirmed that “all Open Graph-enabled web pages will show up in search when a user likes them.” He also calls this Facebook’s “war on Google.”
While utilizing likes and the open graph as a ranking factor in search should help Facebook improve its internal search, it doesn’t represent much of a threat to Google search. Google indexes the web. Facebook indexes activity from Facebook users. There’s a pretty big difference, regardless of how big Facebook is.
There is certainly something to be said for Facebook search, however. There’s no question that a lot lof people are using Facebook and spending a lot of time there, so having some kind of search strategy for Facebook is not a bad idea. Naturally, the Open Graph will play a huge role in this, and that means taking advantage of Facebook’s social plugins. As I’ve written about before, Facebook likes (as well as Twitter retweets) are like the new links in some ways.
Facebook is definitely making a lot of moves to keep users getting the info they want from within Facebook. Fan pages essentially turn Facebook into a news reader. They’re working on a Q&A product. They’re launching content destinations themselves (like this politics page). However, no matter how much information Facebook is able to give users, that amount will always be limited, and will not be able to deliver the web in the way Google can. Of course, that’s why they have Bing results for web search.

As far as search market share, it is probably Bing that stands to gain the most out of improved Facebook search. I don’t know how often people are going to go to Facebook for web searches, but the more people do search on Facebook, the more they are going to see those web results from Bing, when the actual (limited) Facebook results don’t deliver what they want. If Bing can deliver what they want in the top three results (the amount that is commonly displayed in Facebook search results), Bing only stands to gain.
Optimizing for Bing is very connected to optimizing for Facebook and soon optimizing for Yahoo.


Recent Comments